BUKOWSKI |
||||||
.HOME...........................COMMENTARY summarized | ||||||
THIS IS |
|
|||||
bawdy boozey bizarre.... ......see vimeo: 'The Man With the Beautiful Eyes'
From 'FACTOTUM' (going home late from a 12-hour day at work):
Indeed. As we well know: virtually every writer of note, and for that matter of no note, is either middle-class or Jewish - neither of which are renowned for their poverty.. Or, with rather less pathos, contrast that against - From 'Nut Ward Just East of Holywood' in 'TALES OF ORDINARY MADNESS' :
If you can recover from laughing, here's a Short biog' from the net: The following note accompanied Charles Bukowski's first published story, in the March-April 1944 issue of Story:
NOW FROM ME: I stumbled on Bukowski - like most of those other 'GREATS' - by sheer fluke. It was actually a John Fante novel 'Ask the Dust' that hit me first. On the cover it said: "Fante had a major effect on me. Fante was my God." CHARLES BUKOWSKI I thought: who the hell's this Bukowski guy who was so impressed with Fante? So, I sought out his work. After devouring three of his books, it occurred to me that in its way this stuff was as important - admittedly from a less orthodox angle - as, say, Hesse or Camus. In essence, Bukowski's writings are wild and free, scattered with the filth and dregs of the bohemian life, on streets and in flop-houses, in bars and with whores, drunken brawls, orgies etc... as so 'delicately' portrayed in his cult film 'Barfly' - which is quite tame: despite fights and other hassle, at no time does 'Bukowski' appear in the least angry (as too befits the temperament of his work). Although other literature occasionally touches these more earthy aspects of the world, they habitually circumvent the detail: the raw, natural, plain portrayal of life as Bukowski relates it - and he does it so easily and spontaneously, so it seems, unperturbed by what a publisher might make of it. Henry Miller is an exception because he done this too - though, gritty as it often is, he did it in a more refined and sophisticated way. Hesse's writings, in contrast, was highly crafted and polished. His grit was less of the outer everyday earth, than of the id, the inner universe we each carry. The differences here are like that between Rimbaud and Betjeman, say, or - for a plainer comparison - between a fabulous old oak chiffonier from a 12th Century French monastry and a gleaming 21st Century sideboard from Harrods. Take your pick - both if you like, why not? I do. Life is short, but 'glimpse what you can' is what I say. Most literature, though it frequently seems otherwise when skillfully done, is fantasy and make-believe, unreal and fabricated. This is by necessity - since reality, when every trifing detail is examined, can appear dull even when the circumstances described involve dynamic and extraordinary events. Bukowski overcomes this dilemma by selecting, true, but telling it strictly as it is, plain and simple, no fancy work, no dross, just the way it is - or so it seems! Two fine works of his (predominately autobiographical output) are the fairly comprehensive 'Ham on Rye', and the more famous 'Post Office'. The short stories are similar, like disconnected chapters, as in the aforementioned 'Tales of Ordinary Madness'. Then there's the clips he regularly submitted to 'OPEN CITY' - the rival paper to the 'LA Free Press'... ie, from the 'forward': "...There was not the tenseness or the careful carving with a bit of a dull blade, that was needed to write something for The Atlantic Monthly. Nor was there any need to simply tap out a flat and careless journalism (er, journalese??). There seemed to be no pressures. Just sit by the window, lift the beer and.... ...A bum off the road brings in a gypsy and his wife and we talk, bullshit, drink half the night. A long-distance telephone operator from Newberg, N.Y., sends me money. She wants me to give up beer and to eat well. I hear from a madman who calls himself 'King Arthur' and lives on Vine St in Holywood, and wants to help me write my column... " So there we go. And now I'll end this little glimpse at good old CB and his fabulous wayward scripts - in order to bury myself in more of his wild humour and living-life-to-the-full, as they say of bohemian types. He didn't fight drink, he enjoyed it - unlike for me, alcohol didn't incapacitate his brain! * * * * * Below is a clip by a fan from: http://plagiarist.com/poetry/4508/ :
I first read Bukowski in the late 70's when I was 16 years old. He had a short story in Hustler called "An Affair Of No Pacticular Importance", a short piece from his novel "Women". It changed my life, and Bukowski's prose and poetry kept me alive for many, many years. The Genius Of The Crowd - by Charles Bukowskithere is enough treachery, hatred violence absurdity in the average human being to supply any given army on any given day and the best at murder are those who preach against it those who preach god, need god beware the preachers but there is genius in their hatred like a shining diamond their finest art
That poem was written in 1966. And here's a clip from 'Women' I found the other day which made me laugh: "I drank my beer and wandered around. I walked out on the back porch, sat on the stoop in the alley and watched a large black cat trying to get into a garbage can. I walked down towards him. He leapt off the garbage can as I approached. He stood 3 or 4 feet away watching me. I took the lid off the garbage can. The stench was horrible. I puked into the can. I dropped the lid on the pavement. The cat leapt up, stood, all four feet together on the rim of the can. He hesitated, then brilliant under a half-moon, he leapt into it all."
....Cheers...................................--------------------- // ---------------------- |